<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Security Issues With the Blog</title>
	<atom:link href="http://blog.unmaskparasites.com/2009/05/22/security-issues-with-the-blog/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://blog.unmaskparasites.com/2009/05/22/security-issues-with-the-blog/</link>
	<description>Website insecurity by example</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 20 Mar 2010 16:18:55 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.1</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Estadd</title>
		<link>http://blog.unmaskparasites.com/2009/05/22/security-issues-with-the-blog/comment-page-1/#comment-1362</link>
		<dc:creator>Estadd</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 03 Jun 2009 09:22:13 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.unmaskparasites.com/?p=211#comment-1362</guid>
		<description>As I already said you need to reconsider Chrome or Google, they marked things safe when things were unsafe by unmaskparasites or by a simple look at the &quot;view source&quot;

There is no magical way that the big G can detect things when they are not there by any standards. So before saying &quot;you shouldn’t trust even sites like mine&quot; it is worth thinking / taking action to see whether Google or its tactics are safe. For many things they are already unsafe and discarded but I do not want to sound like google hate war here.

What we want is : thing that works practically, usefully and allows us to do browsing comfortably. Google and chrome are not the solution at the moment.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>As I already said you need to reconsider Chrome or Google, they marked things safe when things were unsafe by unmaskparasites or by a simple look at the &#8220;view source&#8221;</p>
<p>There is no magical way that the big G can detect things when they are not there by any standards. So before saying &#8220;you shouldn’t trust even sites like mine&#8221; it is worth thinking / taking action to see whether Google or its tactics are safe. For many things they are already unsafe and discarded but I do not want to sound like google hate war here.</p>
<p>What we want is : thing that works practically, usefully and allows us to do browsing comfortably. Google and chrome are not the solution at the moment.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Rob</title>
		<link>http://blog.unmaskparasites.com/2009/05/22/security-issues-with-the-blog/comment-page-1/#comment-1286</link>
		<dc:creator>Rob</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 22 May 2009 13:07:16 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.unmaskparasites.com/?p=211#comment-1286</guid>
		<description>I usually recommend the forums at WebHostingTalk.com as a good place to find hosts (and offers).  Personally I&#039;m happy with VAServ (http://www.vaserv.com/) who operate as a number of brands, from no frills unmanaged services upwards.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I usually recommend the forums at WebHostingTalk.com as a good place to find hosts (and offers).  Personally I&#8217;m happy with VAServ (<a href="http://www.vaserv.com/" rel="nofollow">http://www.vaserv.com/</a>) who operate as a number of brands, from no frills unmanaged services upwards.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
